Blog

If you are looking for any business-writing course, UK specialists Emphasis can almost certainly help you.

Archive for the ‘Customer relations’ Category

Sainsbury’s prove good PR is easy, tiger

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Have you heard about the tiger that’s turned into a giraffe?

The real story isn’t quite so magical as that sounds. But Sainsbury’s response to a letter from a little girl, which has now led them to change the name of their tiger bread to giraffe bread, was certainly inspired.

For those who missed it, the UK supermarket received a letter last May questioning the name of the pattern-crusted loaf: why call it ‘tiger’ when it was clearly not stripy? ‘It should be called giraffe bread’, the letter went on. ‘Love from Lily Robinson age 3½.’

What’s more, as of 31 January, it is – at least for now. A victory that may be for Lily (who actually ‘hasn’t got much time for’ the story, according to her mother’s blog, where the letters appeared). But it’s Sainsbury’s reputation that’s the real winner, as the story has become an internet sensation. And it’s all thanks to the well-judged and endearing reply that customer-service manager Chris King (age 27â…“) sent.

‘Thanks so much for your letter,’ he wrote. ‘I think renaming tiger bread giraffe bread is a brilliant idea – it looks much more like the blotches on a giraffe than the stripes on a tiger, doesn’t it?

‘It is called tiger bread because the first baker who made it a looong time ago thought it looked stripey like a tiger. Maybe they were a bit silly.’

You’d also have to be pretty silly not to realise the power of social media now has over public opinion. (More than four thousand people Like the Chris King from Sainsbury’s is a legend Facebook page at the time of writing.)

Customer-service representatives probably spend most of their time appeasing angry and outraged letter-writers. But this is a great reminder that you can generate a lot of good feeling by making time for the sweet and silly correspondence too. That’s how you’ll really earn your stripes.

If you’re in the customer-service field, you might also like our article on how to make the most of positive correspondence: Now you’re talking my language.

Should you ever use the passive voice?

Posted by Catie Holdridge

A Write Now reader wrote to us to ask: is it ever acceptable to use the passive voice in ‘good writing’?

It’s a good question. You may be surprised to hear that the answer’s yes.

While it’s best to use the active voice in most cases, the passive voice can – on occasion – be useful. For example, if you had to reply to a customer or client who had made a mistake. You probably wouldn’t want to highlight this fact by pointing the finger, which writing in the active voice would do. For example:

You filled in the form incorrectly.

If you re-wrote this into the passive voice, it’s possible to be much more diplomatic, as you can take out the ‘doer’ (them) altogether:

The form was filled in incorrectly.

And sometimes the ‘who’ isn’t actually relevant. For example, if you were describing a property for sale, you might say:

The conservatory was added to the house in 1998.

That would be fine. The prospective buyers don’t really need to know that

Bob’s Conservatories of Hull added the conservatory to the house in 1998.

So there is a place for the passive voice. Just consider (as always) the needs of the reader before you choose.

And if you have any writing-related queries, why not pose them here in the blog? We’ll get back to you as soon as we can.

Advertising for accuracy

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Cadbury’s Dairy Milk wrappers will no longer bear the long-standing slogan, ‘a glass and a half of full-cream milk’. Instead the less-than-lyrical – but doubtless much more scientifically accurate – ‘the equivalent of 426ml of fresh liquid milk in every 227g of milk chocolate’ will appear in its place.

The makers have clearly picked up on the growing tide of bafflement and rage among the British public at the sheer incongruity of the statement. After all, how the heck did they get a whole glass and a half of milk into one of those little fun-size bars?  ‘The phrase didn’t make sense if the pack stated the bar weighs 49g or 230g,’ a spokesman rightly pointed out.

As yet, Cadbury’s bid for swear-on-a-Bible type honesty won’t actually affect their advertising campaigns. But could those be next?

And what could this mean for other well-known slogans?…

Thank Crunchie it’s Friday, though neither Crunchie nor Cadbury’s can take credit or responsibility for the natural passage of time.

Mr Kipling doesn’t technically make exceedingly good cakes because he is a fictitious, never-seen character created for marketing purposes.

In all honesty, there are times when I wouldn’t rather have a bowl of Coco Pops.

Utterly accurate or not, you can’t help but hope advertisers decide to stick to using a little bit of artistic licence. Because they’re worth it.

Give me the facts, not the excuses

Posted by Rob Ashton

We’re lucky here in Emphasis Towers. Five minutes from Brighton beach and five minutes from the station, we really have got the best of both worlds. The beach is great. It’s close enough to go for a lunchtime dip on those rare days when the thermometer climbs above 10 degrees. (Not that I have since the summer of 1998. I mean, are you mad: it’s freezing in there. But I could if I wanted to, that’s the point.) And what most people call pebbles, we just call ‘big sand’.

But before I make you too jealous, I have to say that it’s not all sea and sunshine. I usually have to get on a train if I want to get out to our clients, which, for obvious reasons, is quite often.

Now there are people more qualified (and even more fed up) than me who can rant about the rail system. So I won’t bother here. But I do wonder why the rail companies don’t at least get their communications right. Take yesterday morning, for example.

Faulty train outside Haywards Heath

After a couple of hours in the office, I arrive at the station in Brighton in what should be plenty of time for an important lunchtime meeting in London. ‘Delayed’ says the departures board. I look for someone to ask for more information. The man at the ticket barrier doesn’t know anything more. I glance at the departure board again, willing it to have some good news. It doesn’t. A few painstakingly long minutes later, there is an announcement:

‘We are sorry to announce that due to problems with the signalling system in the Clapham Junction area and a faulty train outside Haywards Heath, the 11.55 train to London Bridge is running approximately 25 minutes late.

Excuses, excuses – followed by facts. Social niceties and excuses are fine. (There are enough bad manners in the world, after all.) But if we can’t always have a speedy and reliable rail service, at least give us speedy information. As I stand on the platform with my chances of arriving on time slipping away, all I want to know is exactly how late I’m going to be. So why not say:

‘The train to London Bridge is running at least 25 minutes late due to …’

Just give me the information I need first. Then give me the detail and the reasons.

And just to be clear. Southern Rail is not the only offender here. It’s the same when I arrive in London and go to get my tube connection to Euston. Hurrying towards the escalator, I catch a glimpse of a sign that reads: ‘Due to repairs to the track and staff shortages…’ Unfortunately, I’ve already walked past the sign before I get a chance to read the last part of the sentence. But I have a sixth sense that it’s one of those days, so I go back and check the sign again: ‘…there is a very limited service on the Northern Line today’ the second part of the sentence continues.

I’m quite sure many other people walked passed the sign – and some down the escalator to the platform – before they realised that their chances of getting a Northern Line train were pretty slim.

What, then why

It might seem a small thing, but it’s so easy to remedy, both in speaking and writing. Just give people the information they are most interested in first. Then follow up with the whys and wherefores.

In most cases, the part of the sentence people are most interested in is the main clause:

‘The train to London Bridge is running at least 25 minutes late…’

and

‘There is a limited service on the Northern Line today… .’

There are a few exceptions though:

‘Fill in our questionnaire if you want the chance to win £500.’

‘Go to Section B if you are under 18.’

Here, clearly, the most relevant part of the sentence for the reader is in the second bit – the secondary clause. So, when writing this kind of sentence, it’s best to put this part first:

‘If you want the chance to win £500, fill in our questionnaire.’

‘If you are under 18, go to Section B.’

Reader’s perspective

Good writing stems from thinking about what you write from the reader’s perspective. And that includes thinking about how they will read it – for instance, in a hurry trying to catch a train.

But London Underground appears to have learned a thing or two about clear writing while I’ve been in my meeting. On the way home the sign says:

‘A good service is running on all lines’.

What it didn’t say was: ‘Due to the fact that not many people are off sick today and there are no repair works going on, a good service is running on all lines.’

Funny that.