Blog

If you are looking for any business-writing course, UK specialists Emphasis can almost certainly help you.

Archive for the ‘Jargon’ Category

Well, we know it’s big

Posted by Catie Holdridge

David Cameron has referred to it as his ‘mission’ and his ‘passion’, but it does seem that very few people are entirely sure what the ‘Big Society’ is actually all about.

This isn’t too surprising when even those well and truly behind the idea are not helping matters. Phillip Blond, director of the think tank ResPublica, and – according to the Telegraph – ‘a driving force behind David Cameron’s “Big Society” agenda’, has argued the case for the policy in the Independent. He guides the people thus:

‘Public sector mutualisation and budgetary takeover by citizens of the state is a crucial initial phase in endowing ordinary citizens with the power to ensure that the services they run are operated in a way that combines public interest with economic efficiency and localised employee ownership building in all the gains that this model delivers.’

Writing this convoluted and opaque will do very little to clarify the concept for the ‘ordinary citizens’ it claims to want to empower. In relation to this, one letter to the Independent quoted Nobel prize-winner Peter Medawar: ‘People who write obscurely are either unskilled in writing or up to mischief’. The writer then commented: ‘I don’t think Mr Blond is unskilled in writing.’

If Cameron and co. are to defend the ‘Big Society’ as more than (as some rumours have it) a slightly sinister cover for the cuts, they need to put away the thesaurus and use considerably fewer big words.

Dangerous jargon

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Jargon can bring clarity for experts and irritation for laypeople, but could it sometimes be life threatening? Yes, according to the coroner heading up the inquest into the London terrorist attacks of 7 July 2005, Lady Justice Hallett.

Simple impatience with unclear terms is a more serious problem when it comes to understanding the situation at the scene of an emergency, she asserted on the last day of evidence-giving at the 7/7 hearing.

Is it really worth the time it takes to refer to a ‘conference demountable unit from a management centre’, rather than a ‘portable incident room’, for example?

And obscure job titles could confuse and disguise people’s roles, she pointed out. ‘I don’t know whether a crew manager is somebody who is responsible for supplies or is used to fighting fires. I have no idea,’ she said.

Jargon has a long history of naysayers, but Lady Justice Hallett’s criticism touched on the most fundamental practicality of appropriate language. ‘This isn’t just somebody being pedantic about the use of English … when it comes to managing incidents, people don’t understand what the other person is.’

The offence of bad language

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Finally, a House of Commons report that is a cause for celebration.

This is Bad Language: the Use and Abuse of Official Language – the result of an investigation into the many ways in which politicians and civil servants may baffle and intimidate readers with their use of jargon-heavy, euphemism-filled waffle. By making such official documents virtually unreadable, the report points out, the public is effectively denied access to political policies that affect them.

The committee behind the report are planning to crack down on perpetrators by issuing penalties for instances where poor use of language has damaging results, like a person failing to receive benefits or services they are entitled to.

And while their plan is to refer to the offence of bad political language by the rather jargon-y term ‘maladministration’, we really can’t do anything but applaud these announcements.

Is it a feathered sky-dwelling nest-builder? Is it an aerodynamic pan-destinational person carrier? No, it’s Sloganizer!

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Are you struggling to come up with a new nugget of corporate gobbledegook? Could your report benefit from some indecipherable doublespeak? Are you floundering from a lack of filler? Never fear. Sloganizer to the rescue!

The new application for the iPhone brings the old paper Sloganizer right up-to-date – and right into your office.

When it became obvious in the 1970s that ambiguous nonsense was the latest staple of boardrooms around Britain, Sloganizer was born. In its first incarnation, it was made of paper and offered up to 1000 random three-part combinations of meaningless business lingo, such as ‘decentralization of participative ambiguity’.

The latest downloadable version will reveal up to 375,000 internally interchangeable – and utterly incomprehensible – phrases with a simple shake of your iPhone. Some highlights include:

Multi-disciplinary bureaucratic strategy determination
Integral prognosis of fields of tension
Functional conservative alternative behaviour.

While the last one might well refer to David Cameron’s conduct and policies as he tries to elbow Gordon Brown out of the PM spot, we can guarantee that 99 per cent of the slogans will mean absolutely nothing. This is the jargon jackpot.

Please note: Emphasis and the makers of Sloganizer bear no responsibility for any loss of time, money or respect while using this product.

A pollack by any other name

Posted by Catie Holdridge

We should all be eating more pollack, for cod’s sake. So say the environmentalists trying to save the perennial partner to chips from an early, non-watery grave: cod stocks in the North Sea are a mere fifth of what they were forty years ago.

Sainsbury’s have given the humble pollack a makeover to boost its popularity as an alternative. Shoppers have apparently previously blushed to ask for this fish by name. We must now all practise our French accents to request ‘colin’ (pronounced ‘co-lan’), which actually means ‘hake’ across the water.

Honourable motives? Mais oui. But will this prove to be a successful rebrand or just fishy jargon? And it brings to mind that age-old question: what’s in a name?

Quite a lot, it seems, in business. Finding just the right name for a brand is so important that it’s spawned its own industry to take care of the christening for you. It can be the difference between being noticed or passed over; remembered or forgotten – if you will: between being reeled in or thrown back. To borrow from branding firm Hinge’s website: ‘[a] name encapsulates all of the content – intellectual and emotional – that people associate with a product or service.’

The extent to which Colin the pollack will enter public consciousness and public house menus – well, time will tell. If nothing else, people are certainly taking the bait for its comedy and pun potential: why not call it Jackson? What a load of pollacks, etc.

It does seem to be catching on rather better than the PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) campaign to gain sympathy for all fish by renaming them ‘sea kittens’. Even comedy has its limits.

Councils ban jargon – but have they missed the mark?

Posted by Catie Holdridge

Council leaders have banned some 200 examples of the worst management jargon. But there are signs they’ve fallen into the lazy-writing trap themselves.

A press release from the Local Government Association published today says that words such as ‘slippage’ (meaning delay), ‘benchmark’ (measure) and ‘procure’ (buy) are all out. So are management clichés like ‘thinking outside the box’.

Many of the old favourites, like ‘blue-sky thinking’, ‘paradigm’ and ‘synergy’ are on the banned list. But so are some real howlers that we’ve never heard of, such as ‘predictors of beaconicity’ (eh?).

We’ve long argued that such terms and phrases are a barrier to clear communication (see here, here and here). They’re also a sign of lazy thinking. Using words like ‘functionality’ and ‘rebaselining’ (yes, really) are a sure sign that the author isn’t taking time to consider what they really want to say (let alone thinking about the poor reader).

Words and phrases like these are also a great hiding place for someone who doesn’t want to say anything that might rock the boat, as we reported here last week.

But there are some signs of laziness among the LGA themselves. Take a look at the list below and you might wonder about the suitability of some of the alternatives they offer. ‘Money’ is not really a substitute for ‘funding streams’ for example (the latter being much more specific).

Simply implying that ‘cascading’ is redundant without giving an alternative suggests the list was compiled by a public-relations hack with no understanding of management. And erroneously suggesting adjectives like ‘healthy’ as direct alternatives for nouns like ‘wellbeing’ may give serial offenders an excuse to dismiss the list as badly thought out.

Don’t get me wrong. I hate the way many managers stuff their reports full of meaningless pap. Indeed, we spend our working lives weaning them off their thesaurus dependency. But jargon isn’t always the bogeyman.

Good writing is about a lot more than simply avoiding jargon. Although using the LGA’s list, with a few exceptions, is a good start.

The LGA’s list of 200 words and their ‘alternatives’


Across-the-piece – everyone working together
Actioned – do
Advocate – support
Agencies – groups
Ambassador – leader
Area based – in an area
Area focused – concentrating on the area
Autonomous – independent
Baseline – starting point
Beacon – leading light
Benchmarking – measuring
Best Practice – best way
Blue sky thinking – thinking up ideas
Bottom-Up – listening to people
CAAs – why use at all?
Can do culture  – get the job done
Capabilities -
Capacity – ability
Capacity building – enough room in the system
Cascading -  why use at all?
Cautiously welcome – devil in the detail
Challenge – problem
Champion – best
Citizen empowerment ­– people power
Client – person
Cohesive communities – why use at all?
Cohesiveness – together
Collaboration – working together
Commissioning – buy
Community engagement – getting people involved
Compact – why use at all?
Conditionality ­­- why use at all?
Consensual  – everyone agrees
Contestability – Why use at all?
Contextual – background
Core developments – main things that are happening
Core Message ­– main point
Core principles – beliefs
Core Value – belief
Coterminosity – all singing from the same hymn sheet
Coterminous – all singing from the same hymn sheet
Cross-cutting – everyone working together
Cross-fertilisation – spreading ideas
Customer – people/person
Democratic legitimacy – voted in
Democratic mandate – elected to put people first
Dialogue – talk/discuss
Direction of travel – way forward
Distorts spending priorities – ignores people’s needs
Double devolution – Why use at all?
Downstream – Why use at all?
Early Win – success
Edge-fit – Why use at all?
Embedded – set in
Empowerment – people power
Enabler – helps
Engagement – working with people
Engaging users ­– getting people involved
Enhance – improve
Evidence Base – research shows
Exemplar – example
External challenge – outside pressures
Facilitate – help
Fast-Track – speed up
Flex – Why use at all?
Flexibilities and Freedoms  – more power to do the right thing
Framework – guide
Fulcrum – pivot
Functionality – use
Funding Streams – money
Gateway review – Why use at all?
Going forward – in the future
Good Practice – best way
Governance – Why use at all?
Guidelines – guide
Holistic – taken in the round
Holistic governance – Why use at all?
Horizon scanning – Why use at all?
Improvement levers – using the tools to get the job done
Incentivising – incentive
Income Streams – money/cash
Indicators – measurements
Initiative – idea
Innovative capacity – Why use at all?
Inspectorates – monitoring bodies
Interdepartmental – working together
Interface – talking to each other
Iteration – version
Joined up – working together
Joint working – working together
LAAs – Why use at all?
Level playing field – everyone equal
Lever – Why use at all?
Leverage – influence
Localities ­– places/town/city/village
Lowlights – worst bits
MAAs  – Why use at all?
Mainstreaming – Why use at all?
Management capacity – Why use at all?
Meaningful consultation– talking to people
Meaningful dialogue – talking to people
Mechanisms – methods
Menu of Options – choices
Multi-agency ­– many groups
Multidisciplinary – many
Municipalities – towns/cities/areas
Network model – Why use at all?
Normalising – make normal
Outcomes – results
Outcomes – focused
Output – results
Outsourced – privatised
Overarching – Why use at all?
Paradigm – Why use at all?
Parameter – limits
Participatory – joining in
Partnership working – working together
Partnerships – working together
Pathfinder – Why use at all?
Peer challenge – Why use at all?
Performance Network – Why use at all?
Place shaping – creating places where people can thrive
Pooled budgets – money
Pooled resources – time and money
Pooled risk – Why use at all?
Populace – people
Potentialities – chances
Practitioners – experts
Predictors of Beaconicity – Why use at all?
Preventative services – protecting the most vulnerable
Prioritization – most important
Priority – most important
Proactive – Why use at all?
Process driven – shouldn’t everything be people driven?
Procure – buy
Procurement – buying
Promulgate – spread
Proportionality -  in proportion
Protocol – guidance
Provider vehicles – Why use at all?
Quantum – Why use at all?
Quick Hit – success
Quick Win – success
Rationalisation – cut
Rebaselining – Why use at all?
Reconfigured – reform
Resource allocation – money going to the right place
Revenue Streams  – money
Risk based – safest way
Robust – tough
Scaled-back – cut/reduce
Scoping – work out
Sector wise – Why use at all?
Seedbed – idea
Self-aggrandizement – Why use at all?
Service users – people
Shared priority ­– all working together
Shell developments – Why use at all?
Signpost – point in the direction of
Single conversations – talking to
Single Point of Contact – everything under one roof
Situational – situation
Slippage – delay
Social contracts ­ – deal
Social exclusion – poverty
Spatial – Why use at all?
Stakeholder – other organisations
Step Change – improve
Strategic -  planned
Strategic priorities – planned
Streamlined – efficient
Sub-regional – work between councils
Subsidiarity – Why use at all?
Sustainable – long term
Sustainable communities – environmentally friendly
Symposium ­­– meeting
Synergies – what use at all?
Systematics – Why use at all?
Taxonomy – Why use at all?
Tested for Soundness ­– what works
Thematic – theme
Thinking outside of the box – Why use at all?
Third sector – charities and voluntary organisations
Toolkit – guidance
Top-Down – ignores people
Trajectory – route
Tranche – slice
Transactional – Why use at all?
Transformational – change
Transparency – clear
Upstream – Why use at all?
Upward trend – getting better
Utilise – use
Value-added – extra
Vision ­– ideal/dream/belief
Visionary – ideal/dream/belief
Welcome – necessary and needed/step in the right direction
Wellbeing – healthy
Worklessness – unemployed

Microsoft to improve ‘buying experience at retail’. (That’s ‘shopping’ to you and me.)

Posted by Rob Ashton

Microsoft has announced it’s to open its own shops, in a clear bid to grab a slice of the Apple retail action.

Apple trades on its image as the quintessence of cool: all innovative design and sleek lines. Microsoft may face an uphill battle in this respect, at least if its press release announcing the move is anything to go by.

It quotes Kevin Turner, Microsoft’s chief operating officer, as saying:

We’re working hard to transform the PC and Microsoft buying experience at retail by improving the articulation and demonstration of the Microsoft innovation and value proposition so that it’s clear, simple and straightforward for consumers everywhere.

‘What?’ you may ask. Good question.

I was going to offer a translation, but I’m afraid it’s stumped me. Some ‘clear, simple and straightforward’ language might be a good start, Mr Turner.