Being extraordinarily knowledgeable can have the unfortunate side effect of being extraordinarily boring.
So if youโre writing a report on something you are an expert on, how do you make sure it imparts all the information the reader needs, without putting them to sleep? The chap in the picture knows a tip or two, and we’ll come back to him a bit later.
Context is everything
One thing that can make knowledgeable writers boring is an imbalance in information between writer and reader. If you know a lot, and your reader knows very little, there is a danger of factual overload. This can be dull or overwhelming. (If the reader is polite, they will probably call the report โdenseโ or โtechnicalโ โ at least to your face.)
Itโs context thatโs the problem. Context is the medium within which facts make sense. You, having immersed yourself in your subject for months or years, are positively dripping with context. Your reader, coming face to face with the subject for the first time, isnโt. As a result, what you may find interesting, they may find rather dry.
As a question-setter for the BBC quiz show Mastermind, Iโm routinely confronted by this kind of imbalance. I stand by the principle that knowledge is never boring. To those who know all there is to know about their specialist subject, itโs all interesting.
When you know that Joseph Gayetty is said to have invented the first commercial toilet paper in 1857, itโs interesting that Emperor Hongwu of China was ordering custom-made toilet paper for the imperial court back in the 14th century.
And when you know that, in cricket, the googly is usually delivered out of the back of the bowlerโs hand, itโs interesting that the Australian Jack Iverson found a way to deliver it from between his thumb and forefinger.
Every field of endeavour and every sector of business is stuffed with this sort of buried treasure.
Just the facts
So how do you persuade your readers to find these things as interesting as you do?
Itโs not about compromising on accuracy. Without integrity, without a commitment to the facts, your reports wonโt do the job you need them to do. Putting reader appeal before accuracy might suit a tabloid newspaper, but itโs self-defeating when your primary goal is effective communication.
Instead, itโs about identifying the elements of your report or proposal that flourish without a support network of life-giving context. We might call them โmudskippersโ, after the fish that have the ability to breathe and move around on land as well as underwater.
How do you spot a mudskipper? Letโs say I have room in my report for 50 facts. Letโs say that the central, critical message of my report constitutes 20 of these. These are the facts that simply have to go in, be they ditchwater-dull or mudskipper-interesting. And thatโs fine โ this is a business report, after all.
Not all facts are equally interesting
What weโre discussing here are those other 30 facts, the information that comprises your supporting argument and turns a stark list of take-home statements into an engaging and fully rounded report. This is where your mudskipper-spotting skills can make the difference.
As a knowledgeable person, youโre in the privileged position of being able to see the goings-on behind the green curtain. This privileged position is hard-earned โ but itโs one you have to relinquish if you want to do a good job of communicating your expertise. You have to swallow the unpalatable reality that, to your readers, not all facts are equally interesting.
You may come to understand how Charles Darwin felt when, after spending decades establishing himself as an all-time world expert on barnacles, all anyone ever wanted to ask him about was On The Origin Of Species. Itโs frustrating, but itโs necessary.
Go fishing for mudskippers
Mudskippers โ those versatile ideas that still thrive when taken out of context โ don’t have to be sensational. Indeed, if they are, treat them with caution. Nor should they be trivial. They should help the reader understand your message. But, just as importantly, they should make the reader want to understand.
Theyโll often jump out at you during the research process, so keep your eyes peeled. They might be of a different category to the surrounding information: a name rather than a number, say. They might have a hinterland (historical, geographical, cross-sectoral). Or they might introduce an element of humanity โ a quotation can sometimes be a mudskipper, for example.
Mudskippers are facts with flavour. Theyโre the information equivalent of umami โ that fifth flavour of savoury hard-to-describe โmeatinessโ โ the quality that makes everything just that bit more moreish. So they have the power to keep your reader hooked throughout your report. And that gives it a better chance of doing its job.
Yes, knowledge is power. But only when you know how to use it.
Image credit: Vivi Wu / Shutterstock
