1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. 60-second fix: should have or should of?

Blog

60-second fix: should have or should of?

<1 minute read

hand holding stopwatch
hand holding stopwatch

This is a nice, easy one to answer. No sitting on the fence, no โ€˜itโ€™s down to personal preferenceโ€™. We won’t even need the full minute.

Here goes:

Should have, would have, could have โ€“ correct
Should of, would of, could of โ€“ incorrect

The error is widespread and dates back nearly 200 years. The cause? Simply that shouldโ€™ve sounds identical to should of in a lot of accents. In fact, many of us hardly voice the second word at all, so itโ€™s little wonder that weโ€™re not quite sure how to write it.

The of version is now such a well-known error that some authors of fiction (rather snobbily) use it in dialogue to indicate a characterโ€™s lack of education. There are examples in this post on Stan Carey’s blog.

โ€˜Shoulda woulda coulda are the last words of a foolโ€™, sang Beverley Knight. Weโ€™re pretty sure she was talking about grammar.

To avoid being that fool, remember: you just have to use have.

 

Image credit: mohd kamarul hafiz / Shutterstock

 

Get your free business-writing lesson

Subscribe

Expert advice to your inbox

Cathy Dann (nee Relf)

Cathy is a certified word and editing expert, having worked as a sub-editor, editor and copywriter at, to name a few, the Guardian, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, Which? and The Grocer.

You might also like