1. Home
  2. Author archive for: Cathy Dann
Cathy Dann (nee Relf)
Cathy Dann

Cathy is a certified word and editing expert, having worked as a sub-editor, editor and copywriter at, to name a few, the Guardian, The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, Which? and The Grocer.

You can always leave ‘that’ out – true or false?

Recently, we were asked to settle a dispute between colleagues over the word that. The example given was: 'The consensus was the chief executive was right' vs 'The consensus was that the chief executive was right'. Our correspondent had written the former, but his...

Difficult apostrophes: six do’s and don’ts

Apostrophes are unpredictable little blighters. No sooner have you mastered the basics than they pop up in new and unexpected places, apparently breaking all the rules. Should they, for example, be involved when you “cross the i’s and dot the t’s”? How about in the Ts...

Spaces and units: survey results

In our post on units and spaces, we asked readers to take a short survey. We're delighted to report that 130 people did – and here are the results. Overall, most of you were in favour of closing up the number and unit, with four fifths preferring ‘1.75cm' to ‘1.75...

Spaces and units: 60(ish)-second fix

Recently a reader asked us whether it was correct to put a space between a number and a unit (eg ‘4 cm’), or to close them up (‘4cm’). Well, what a can of contradictory worms that turned out to be. When it comes to units of measure, it seems some like to get up close...

Five fun festive facts (etymologically speaking)

Go prepared to your office parties and family gatherings this year. If the conversation wanes and you’ve already exhausted the Christmas cracker jokes, no problem. Simply crack out one of these little beauties and get the party restarted* in no time. 1. Are the yoof...

60-second fix: should have or should of?

This is a nice, easy one to answer. No sitting on the fence, no ‘it’s down to personal preference’. We won't even need the full minute. Here goes: Should have, would have, could have – correct Should of, would of, could of – incorrect The error is widespread and dates...

Lord Neuberger’s advice on clearer legal writing

When it comes to calls for improving legal writing, few are made with more authority than this. Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, President of the Supreme Court, has said that judges themselves need to change the way they write – or risk losing the public’s confidence in...

Twitter challenge: the results

Last week, we set our readers a challenge: to shorten a paragraph and tweet it to us at  @EmphasisWriting, with the hashtag #EmphasisTest, using Stan Carey's tips on writing concisely for Twitter. We've had some excellent responses, and choosing a winner has been...

France bans the word ‘hashtag’

Sacré bleu! France has added hashtag to its list of banned English words, writes Cathy Dann. The Académie française, the state body appointed to protect the French language, has announced that the English word is to be eschewed in favour of the French mot-dièse....

OK, ok, okay. How do you write OK?

We received the following question from Tim, one of our newsletter readers: ‘Is it okay to write “OK” as “ok”? Or should the abbreviated form always be in upper case?’ Little did he know the amount of discussion his question would generate in the office, writes Cathy...